The dawn of the new research group “UnEviL”

Uncertainty and Evidence Lab is the name of a new research group at Lund University. The group is led by Ullrika Sahlin at the Centre of Environmental and Climate Research.

Can we trust what we see or believe?

This research group focus on the management of uncertainty and evidence in risk analysis, evidence synthesis, decision analysis and, never the least, predictive sciences. This include discussing and applying principles and methods for learning, forecasting and decision analysis under different strengths in knowledge. We seek to apply the principles and methods on conceptual and actual problems and we are not limited to a specific application.

The research group, ongoing activities and output are presented at Lund University research portal

UnEviL research group 0

Bayes@Lund2017 20th April

The program for Bayes@Lund2017 is now ready

Follow us at #bayeslund17 on twitter

We have uploaded videos of some of the talks on YouTube. Unfortunately not all talks have been recorded because of technical issues.

Richard McElreath — Bayesian Statistics without Frequentist Language:
Martin Stjernman — Joint species modelling. Beautiful in theory, tricky in practice:
Shravan Vasishth — Finite mixture modeling: a case study involving retrieval processes in sentence comprehension:
Mark Andrews –Teaching Bayesian methods to social scientists:
Stefan Wiens — Making the most of your ANOVAs: From NHST to Bayesian analyses:
Judith Bütepage — Learning to make decisions under uncertainty:

Ullrika Sahlin — Using expert’s knowledge in Bayesian analysis: link to presentation no video unfortunately Sahlin_BayesatLund2017

We start in room MA4, Maths building Annex, Sölvegatan 20. We also have a booklet of the abstracts programBayes@Lund2017 maps and tips.

[for the tutorial on 19 April go here]

08.30-9.00 Registration

09.00-9.10 Welcome and an overview of Bayesian activities in Lund: Umberto Picchini and Ullrika Sahlin

9.10-10.05 Keynote talk Darren Wilkinson: Hierarchical modelling of genetic interaction in budding yeast

10.05-10.30 coffee break

Bayesian Analysis I

10.30-10.55 Stefan Wiens, Making the most of your ANOVAs: From NHST to Bayesian analyses

10.55-11.20 Martin Stjernman, Joint species modelling — beautiful in theory, tricky in practice

11.20-11.45 Shravan Vasishth, Finite mixture modeling: a case study involving retrieval processes in sentence comprehension

11.45-13.05 Lunch break  

13.05-14.00 Keynote talk Richard McElreath: Understanding Bayesian statistics without frequentist language

Decisions and Teaching

14.00-14.25 Judith Butepage: Learning to make decisions under uncertainty

14.25-14.50 Mark Andrews: Teaching Bayesian Data Analysis to Social Scientists

14.50-15.10 coffee break

Parallel Sessions

Bayesian Analysis II (room MA7)

15.10-15.35 Thomas Hamelrick: Potentials of mean force for protein structure prediction: from hack to math

15.35-16.00 Junpeng Lao: Statistical Inferences of Eye movement data using Bayesian smoothing

Teaching Bayes (room MA6)

15.10-15.35 Richard Torkar: Convincing researchers to transition to Bayesian statistics – the case of software engineering

15.35-16.00 Bertil Wegmann: Experiences from teaching Bayesian inference to students familiar with frequentist statistics

all back in room MA7 for the final session

Bayesian Analysis III (room MA7)

16.05-16.30 Erik Lindström: Multilevel Monte Carlo methods for inference in multivariate diffusions

16.30-16.55 Ullrika Sahlin: Using expert’s knowledge in Bayesian analysis

Funding from the research schools BECC and COMPUTE is greatly appreciated

meetings 0

Workshop on Bayesian Networks for risk assessment and decision making

We had a successful workshop on Bayesian Networks in risk assessment and decision making in Lund March 28 and 29th, 2017.

This workshop was financed by the research school ClimBEco.

Local organisers were Indrani Hazel Govender and Ullrika Sahlin.

Tuesday March 28th

Introduction to Bayesian Networks for risk and impact assessment to support decision making.

This introduction was attended by 30 people. It was an interactive and intensive introduction of BNs led by Wayne Landis, Western Washington University, United States, and Ullrika Sahlin, Lund University Centre of Environmental and Climate Research, Lund, Sweden. The participants were provided a theoretical background together with hands on exercises from risk and impact assessments and decision making.

Wayne telling his story about why Bayesian Networks is useful

Ullrika dicussing the step to inform the parameters of your network










More information with links to the presentations is available here:

Final session at the pub

Wednesday March 29th

Open seminar with following workshop on Applications and future developments of Bayesian Networks in risk and impact assessments and environmental decision making.

Talks and abstracts are available at the website:

Wayne is showing one of his conceptual models for assessing risk.

Anna presented her PhD project using Bayesian Networks

A final line up of those left to the bitter but happy end.

more info – contact Ullrika Sahlin at

Uncategorized 0

Studentprojekt: Tuggummin som en indikator för nedskräpning i urbana miljöer

Studenter sökes för ett projekt under våren 2017

Detta projekt går ut på att ta reda på hur förekomst av tuggummin förhåller sig till förekomst av skräp i urbana miljöer samt att undersöka i vilken takt nedskräpning sker på olika typer av platser i städer.

Länkar till hur tuggumin uppmärksammas

Projektet innehåller en fältstudie där mängd och ålder på tuggumin undersöks för att skatta var och hur snabbt tuggumin hamnar på gatan och om depositionshastigheten av tuggumin beror på hur många tuggumin som redan finns.  I fältstudien undersöks också förekomst av annat skräp, med syftet att ta reda på om tuggummin är en bra indikator för nedskräpning. Skräp som papper, plast och till en viss del fimpar, har en tendens att flytta på sig, medan tuggummin ligger kvar. Om det finns ett starkt samband kan det ge grund till att föreslå att tuggummin är en bra indikator för nedskräpning.

Studien är en upprepning av en liknande studie gjord i stora städer i England, vilket möjliggör en jämförelse.

Projektet kommer att utöver fältarbete, innehålla en del arbete med GIS.

Det är möjligt att dela upp projektet mellan flera studenter.

Handledare Peter Olsson och Ullrika Sahlin

skicka mail direkt till och om du är intresserad

students/teaching 0

Applications and future developments of Bayesian Networks in risk and impact assessments and environmental decision making

Open seminar and workshop

When: Wednesday March 29th 2017. From 10 to 14, followed by discussions

Where: The Blue Hall and the Red Room in the Ecology Building, Lund University, Sölvegatan 37, Lund, Sweden

Scroll down to view the list of talks and links to presentations


Bayesian Networks is a type of probabilistic modelling with wide applications in science and decision making. BNs is a modelling framework that enable us to integrate evidence to inform decisions, based on causal relations between decision, states and impact variables. BNs allows integration of data and expert knowledge.

This workshop will demonstrate the application of BNs in risk and impact assessment and environmental management, and, discuss and critically reflect on the developments and applications of BNs in research and decision making, through the use of case studies.

Invited speakers

Wayne Landis, Institute of Environmental Toxicology, Huxley College of the Environment, Western Washington University, United States. Wayne is a Professor in Environmental Science and a Director of the Institute of Environmental Toxicology at Western Washington University. He has over 20 years of experience in ecological risk assessment research, using Bayesian networks to guide decision making.

Sakari Kuikka, University of Helsinki, Finland. Sakari is a Professor in fisheries science and a head of the Fisheries and Environmental Management Group research group.


Adaptive management using Bayesian tools to meet the challenges of uncertainty, climate change and the challenge of making decisions – Wayne Landis

Talk: BN Workshop Wayne Landis

Abstract: Environmental contamination, invasive species, changes in technology, and climate change are individually management challenges, but in reality, each intersects with the other.  This interaction is coupled with dramatic social changes in Europe, North America and across the world.  The question becomes how to effectively manage this mélange of factors within the cacophony of social norms.  Terms like “risk” and “uncertainty” also have multiple meanings, often with emotional undertones.  This talk will introduce the approach of using a Bayesian net based risk assessment framework coupled with an adaptive management framework.  Bayesian networks can be built to include multiple stressors affecting endpoints that represent ecological status and human well-being.  The process of adaptive management includes an initial risk assessment coupled to specific predictions regarding management options (hypotheses), followed by observation of the environment, and reconstruction of the Bayesian network to update the model.  The approach is closely coupled to decision making and is intended to be adaptable.  One of the goals in this approach is to accept uncertainty as a normal situation both in the understanding of the managed system, the efficacy of the management solutions, and in the societal norms.

Learning chains in oil spill risk analysis – Sakari Kuikka

Talk: BN Workshop Sakari Kuikka

Abstract: We review the experience obtained in developing integrative Bayesian models in interdisciplinary risk analysis focusing on oil spill in the Gulf of Finland. Moreover, we also discuss the future challenges in this demanding modeling task. We have applied Bayesian models to the oil spill risk analysis in interdisciplinary questions. Bayesian belief networks are flexible tools that can take into account the different research traditions and the various types of information sources. One of the advantages of using Bayesian decision analysis for management is that the uncertainty estimates are scientifically justified. Moreover, the Bayesian inference offers and important possibility to learn effectively from many sources of information, and the results of one integrative model can, and we argue that they should, be used as priors for next accidents so that the learning component from previous spills is as high as possible. Especially in cases where society is assumed to be risk averse, the uncertainty estimates have a crucial role.

Assessing multiple climate change impacts on water quality: a Bayesian Networks approach – Anna Sperotto

Talk: BN Workshop Anna Sperotto

Abstract: Bayesian Networks are employed for the implementation of a multi-risk model to assess cascading impacts induced by multiple stressors on water quality taking into account multiple climate and land use scenarios. Specifically, Bayesian Networks are applied as a meta-modelling tool for structuring and combining the information coming from existing hydrological models simulations, climate change and land use scenarios and to prioritize the contribute of different stressors on water quality status.

A Bayesian approach for safety barrier portfolio optimization – Alessandro Mancuso

Talk: BN Workshop Alessandro Mancuso

Abstract: In the framework of Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA), we develop a method to support the selection of cost-effective portfolios of safety measures. This method provides a systemic approach to determining the optimal portfolio of safety measures that minimizes the risk of the system and thus provides an alternative to using risk importance measures for guiding the selection of safety measures. We represent combinations of events leading to system failure with Bayesian Belief Networks (BBNs) which can be derived from traditional Fault Trees (FTs) and are capable of encoding event dependencies and multi-state failure behaviors. We also develop a computationally efficient enumeration algorithm to identify which combinations (portfolios) of safety measures minimize the risk of failure at different costs of implementing the safety measures. The method is illustrated by revisiting an earlier case study concerning the airlock system of a CANDU Nuclear Power Plant (NPP). The comparison of results with those of choosing safety measures based on risk importance measures shows that our approach can lead to considerably lower residuals risks at different cost levels.

Application of Bayesian Networks in integrated water resource management – Hazel Indrani Govender

Talk: BN Workshop Hazel Govender

Abstract: Water catchments are complex, with water resources receiving impacts from a vast range of land-use activities. Integrated Water Resource Management (IWRM) is a holistic approach that attempts to integrate the sustainable management of the water, land and related resources within the broader socio-economic and political context.  Risk assessment at a catchment scale, requires the consideration of multiple stressors and many causal relationships that result from the interactions between the components of ecosystems.  The Relative Risk Model, using Bayesian Networks (BNs), is used to assess the risks in a water stressed, economically critical water catchment in South Africa.  The focus on the study area by the authorities and government, has facilitated a number of research efforts and collaborations.  This is bringing together experts and a range of stakeholders in working towards protection of the water resources in the catchment.  This is beneficial to the application of Bayesian Networks as the information and data resulting from these research efforts can contribute to knowledge gaps and missing data.  This can facilitate updating of the BNs and contribute to an adaptive management approach to protecting water resources in the catchment.

What is needed to get Bayesian Networks robust to weaknesses in knowledge? – Ullrika Sahlin

Talk: BN Workshop Ullrika Sahlin

Abstract: Also the sun has its spots. Bayesian Networks are useful, but has its limitations. I will mention some problems with BNs coming from weaknesses in knowledge. Instead of leaving you in total misery, I will end with some suggestions on how to deal with these issues without totally abandoning Bayesian Networks.

This workshop is funded by the research school ClimBEco 

Local organisers were Indrani Hazel Govender and Ullrika Sahlin


meetings/risk research 0

Workshop: Introduction to Bayesian Networks for risk and impact assessment to support decision making

The aim of is workshop was to introduce Bayesian (Belief) Networks to students and researchers. We will provide a theoretical background together with hands on exercises from risk and impact assessments and decision making.

When: Tuesday March 28th at 10 to 16

Where: Heden (room bottom floor), Ecology Building, Lund University, Sölvegatan 37, Lund, Sweden

The workshop is free of charge. The workshop is supported by the research school ClimBEco.

Target audience:

Undergraduate and graduate students and researchers interested in learning how to build and use Bayesian (Belief) Networks to integrate evidence, assess risk or impacts, and evaluate decision alternatives. We will use examples from environmental risk and impact assessments, but the scope of the workshop is BNs with no particular type of application. No previous experience in BNs is needed. Participants are encouraged to study a literature list sent out prior to the workshop.


A Bayesian Network is a modelling framework that enable us to integrate evidence to inform decisions, based on causal relations between decision, state and impact variables. BNs allows integration of data and expert knowledge.

The workshop will be facilitated by:

Wayne Landis, Western Washington University, United States.

Wayne is a Professor in Environmental Science and a Director of the Institute of Environmental Toxicology at Western Washington University. He has over 20 years of experience in ecological risk assessment research, using Bayesian networks to guide decision making.

Ullrika Sahlin, Center for Environmental and Climate Research, Lund, Sweden.

Ullrika is a researcher with focus on risk, uncertainty and decision making.

Schedule with links to presentations


In order to get more out of the workshop we encourage you to study the literature before the workshop.

  • Marcot, B. G., J. D. Steventon, G. D. Sutherland, and R. K. McCann. 2006. Guidelines for developing and updating Bayesian belief networks applied to ecological modeling and conservation. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36:3063-3074. Link
  • J. Pearl. A short note on Bayesian networks prepared for the MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive sciences. Downloaded from
  • The support documentation for using GENIE includes an introduction to decision analysis and Bayesian networks:
  • Herring, C. E., J. Stinson, and W. G. Landis. 2015. Evaluating nonindigenous species management in a Bayesian networks derived relative risk framework for Padilla Bay, WA, USA. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 11:640-652. Link

We will run examples in R and GENIE ( In order to do the hands-on exercises we recommend that you have these programs on you computer when you come to the workshop.


students/teaching 0

Bayes@Lund2017 – note the date and call for abstracts

Save the date! The fourth edition of Bayes@Lund will be held on 20 April 2017 in Lund, Sweden.

The purpose of this conference is to bring together researchers, practitioners and students working with or interested in Bayesian methods. Bayes@Lund aims at being accessible to those with little experience of Bayesian methods while still being relevant to experienced practitioners.

It will feature keynote lectures from Prof. Darren Wilkinson and Prof. Richard McElreath, in addition to a number of contributed talks. On the 19th April there will be a free introductory tutorial to Bayesian analysis.

The conference is free to attend and registration will open in February. For more information see the conference web page:

*** Call for Contributions ***

We’re looking for contributed talks and any topic related to Bayesian analysis is relevant including, but not restricted to:

* Case studies. Have you used Bayesian methods in your research? Describe what you did, and how it worked out.
* Methodology development. Are you developing novel Bayesian methods that you want to share?
* Tutorial style talks. Want to share your favorite tool or modeling technique? This does not have to be novel research, just a useful tool for research!
* Teaching Bayes. Do you have experiences teaching Bayesian methods. What were the challenges, and do you have any useful tips?

To contribute a talk please send a plain text email (no pdf attachments) with the title of your talk, authors names with affiliations, email addresses, and an abstract (not more than 150 words) to

As the audience will be highly heterogeneous, the talk is expected to be accessible and engaging for a multidisciplinary audience.

Deadline for abstracts submission is the 10th of February, 2017  (notification of acceptance sent by 15 February).

Each accepted speaker is given 20 minutes (plus 5 minutes for questions).

We’re looking forward to see you in Lund!


The organizers

Umberto Picchini and Ullrika Sahlin

Uncategorized 0

Intensive and fun -2016’s graduate course on risk, uncertainty and decision making is now completed

This was a course funded by the research schools LUCID and ClimBeco. 26 students participated. We had two physical meetings. One in Lund and one in Gothenburg. The one in Gothenburg included a 1.5 day risk conference – the 2nd Nordic Chapter Risk meeting. We were a bit afraid that it would be too much, but on the contrary – we felt that the students got exposed to high quality keynotes and contributed talks, saw the width of risk research and actually made new connections. The small format of the risk conference (about 100 people) and friendly atmosphere made them feel welcomed.

Me and Åsa Knaggård decided to have this course since we had a similar one when we were PhD-students. Now, ten years later – it was time to pay back. We learnt a lot and hope that the students did too. It was excellent to have Daniel Slunge on the team to help us out in Gothenburg and using his network to get good lecturers.





Uncategorized 0

Great talks and networking at the 2nd Nordic chapter risk meeting

Last week risk researchers and other interested in the risk field came to Gothenburg to take part in the 2nd annual meeting of the Nordic chapter of the Society for Risk analysis. Last year in Lund was successful so our expectations were high. I must say that this year became even more successful.

The keynote speakers were excellent – all of them. Read more on the web page for the conference

We had fun, the atmosphere was friendly and the topics highly relevant and interesting.

Check out the flow on twitter #srae16 to see what was going on.

A more in depth summary is available nordic_sra_meeting_gbg2016. Thanks to Randa Kachef for the reporting and the high quality photos.




Ullrika and Åsa Boholm (chair) opens the meeting. Åsa talks to the president of SRA James Lambert. Ortwin Renn in his keynote.

















At the Nordic chapter SRA business meeting Ullrika (president) and Marja (president elect) informed about the next meeting which will be in Finland 2017


The European SRA conference will be in Sweden 2018.






More keynotes: Nick Pidgeon, Sven-Ove Hansson, Barbara Czarniawska, Jaana Huso-Kallio



The Nordic chapter handed out two awards: Caroline Fredriksson for the best student presentation and Christina Mauléon & Maria Spante for the best presentation.


meetings/risk research 0

The ESREL risk image competition over

This year the ESREL conference in Glasgow decided to do a risk image competition. What a wonderful idea. Time to go creative.

The task was to illustrate risk. After several months of scratching my head I saw the deadline approaching too fast.

My children came to the rescue. My oldest son had built something in lego that with some slight imagination looked like the Eiffel tower. At the same time the middle son played the board game risk, which we all know has a lot of dices in it. I was cleaning my room and found a dusty mirror in a corner.

Bam – there it was. The image illustrating what it means to assess the probability of unique event – such as a terrorist attack or something which we just have not experienced before.


litenbildriskHow do we assess the probability of a unique event? It is not repeatable. Sometimes we just have to believe – somehow. 

Did I win? Well, almost. I got in the final with a nice certificate to put on the wall.


Thanks Lesley Walls for arranging this stimulating competition





Uncategorized 0